What’s up with the world?

February 2nd, 2010 8:28pm
The MailOnline reports that the Dubai World Islands are beginning to sink back into the sea.

When the project was launched in 2003, it was hoped that celebrities and the super-rich would snap up the 300 islands, which made up a map of the globe. Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt were even said to be thinking about buying Ethiopia.

I wonder which one of them will get Ethiopia if they separate as predicted?

While officially the project has just been delayed, the islands are rapidly merging together and also appear to be sinking.

The picture was  taken by a NASA astronaut – a member of the  ISS Expedition on January 13, 2010.

And for the camera buffs the photo was taken with:

A £3,000 Nikon D2Xs digital camera with a focal length of 400 mm to take the photograph. It was then enhanced to improve contrast.

Nice picture – shame about the world though!

Dubai's World Islands photographed by NASA from space

Whittaker’s blog comment of the week award

February 1st, 2010 8:01pm

This week’s comment of the week award goes once again to Charmaine – for her thoughtful insights regarding Winston’s speech to the University of Auckland.

Once again please email me your chocolatey preference Charmaine and I will get it in the post to you asap :-)

Please remember all comments qualify for the award each week, just remember to check back on Mondays to see if you have won. 

And please keep the comments coming – open debate is a vital building block of any democracy.

Charmaine says:
 Just more dog whistle from Winston.  He makes some good points but his record says that HE was part of the problem with MMP and he is the reason we are dissatisfied with it.

While I like some of the message I have a major problem with the messenger and do not for one second believe that he can offer us any solutions.

FWIW his main support base has been the elderly (many of whom may not make the election) and the racing industry. The second support base is the interesting one as most racing folk voted for him as a reward for the money he brought to the industry when in Government. If he is not in power then he can’t get anything for the industry and as most racing people are pragmatic (and not really interested in politics) he won’t be getting their vote in 2011. This is not a conspirasy theory just something based on my exposure to the reacing industry.

I do not think Winston will be a factor in New Zealand politics in the future, it will be a sad day for this country if we are fooled by this show pony again.

R.I.P. Hiren Mohini

February 1st, 2010 8:23am

Stuff reports on the senseless murder of taxi driver and father 39 year old Hiren Mohini.

Friends said Mr Mohini had emigrated to New Zealand six years ago from Mumbai, India, to raise his family somewhere safe.

Sadly New Zealand can no longer be regarded in this manner.  Mr Mohini was by all accounts a hard working gentle man, who loved his family and was earning an honest living driving taxis. 

He is survived by his mother, wife and two young daughters, aged 5 and 3.

A father and a husband, who for the sake of a $20.00 taxi fare is no longer able to take care of the family he loved.

Blogger’s bytes

January 31st, 2010 7:24pm

Deborah Coddington seems to agree with one of my earlier posts about the “spectacle of Ratana” in her column in the NZ Herald today.

Whaleoil keeps up the good fight over the latest case of name suppression

Crusader Rabbit has the lovely story of a the dog rescued from the Baltic Sea

and No Minister wonders aloud how long before Sue Kedgeley throws in the political towel

Symbols that disrespect

January 31st, 2010 10:38am

A Maori academic was reported this week as saying the new Air NZ uniforms are disrespectful and that “businesses should consult more thoroughly with Maori when they used symbols with special significance.

I am sure that many people also find the use of this flag disrespectful.  I note that little consultation was undertaken with New Zealanders when using this symbol in places of special significance. 

 

Winston Peters on MMP

January 30th, 2010 8:34am

Winston Peters gave a speech to Political Science students at Auckland University yesterday which made some interesting points.

Despite what some might tell you, politics is not one of those subjects which can be described with a simple formula.

This is particularly true of the outcome of our elections now under MMP where  “who gets to sit at the top table” is not decided on the basis  of a clear cut mathematical formula like it should be but ultimately on the basis of “who likes who the most.”

At the moment I work for a most reasonable boss – myself – but with great prospects of getting an old job back next year.

It certainly doesn’t sound as though Winston has plans to retire anytime soon!

You will have studied the background to MMP – or to use the correct term Mixed Member Proportional Representation.

New Zealanders voted for it because the two main parties, National and Labour in the 80’s and 90’s, would not stick to their pre-election manifestos.

And how has MMP changed the fact that political parties do not stick to their pre-election manifestos?  Under MMP they now  have an “out” because they can say a particular policy was not possible under their MMP coalition agreement.

Worse than that both came to power with an inner cabal cherishing hidden agendas

Again how has any of this changed under MMP?

The Royal Commission recommended that a hundred MPs in a new MMP system would work. We ended up with 120 because the two old parties reckoned that the 20 extra would put voters off the change.

Someone please tell me that was not the real reason we ended up with 120 instead of 100 MPs?

In time, the Maori seats were supposed to go. We were all to be blended in – as we should be!

I agree.  But what party will have the political will do ever do the right thing – now that The Maori Party are a potential MMP partner for any willing political suitor?

When the foreshore legislation was passed National claimed that we were giving it away to Maori.

The Maori Party was claiming that it was stolen.

Now these two parties – from totally opposing points of view – claim they are going to sort it out.

Winston is carefully positioning himself to make political capital out of the foreshore legislation.

Watch now how National is squirming over an issue they can not compromise on…

This is why they are delaying the decision.

On this issue, what the Maori party want, National can’t sell to their constituents and vice versa.

There is no middle ground without one side taking a major hit.

Winston has summed the forebed issue up in a nutshell!  He is  also aligning  himself with National’s own constituency base – National will have to tread very carefully this year!

This issue has highlighted an unforseen and unfortunate aspect of MMP.

At no stage did we ever expect that MMP would provide a continuing basis for race-based politics in New Zealand.

It is fair to say that no-one anticipated that this would be a major unintended consequence of MMP

We were a country, justifiably or not, that prided itself on doing its best for both Maori and non-Maori and treating everyone equally under the law. We were not perfect but our record was better than most colonised nations.

Now we have the Maori Party with its separatist agenda with one of its MPs preaching an appalling message of hate against another race…

We are in fact only one nation, and a small one at that.

You gotta hand it to Winston he has summed up the situation very well!

Now, the prime minister and his mate Hone Harawira have decided – at great expense – that the Maori Party flag should fly with the New Zealand ensign on Waitangi Day.

This news has insulted many New Zealanders – both Maori and non-Maori – and Maori leaders at Waitangi hosting the event won’t have a bar of it!

It is an example of the misuse of MMP.

I agree.  Questions regarding our flag could be handled via referenda at general elections. Our flag should not be used as a bartering tool during MMP negotiations.

You’ve all heard or seen the British comedy TV show “the two Ronnies” – well we have our own comedy show starring the “two Hones”.

Hone, of course, is Maori for John – and the two “Hones” don’t give a “Heke” about who they insult on Waitangi Day.

Sadly that is what our country is being forced to endure over this issue – extremists and radicals, trying to pass themselves off as moderate and reasonable.

I think he has a point – many New Zealanders are timid about voicing their opinions on this issue for fear of being seen as politically incorrect when in fact much of the rhetoric is being driven by extremists and radicals!

Democracy under MMP is patently, obviously more representative, abandoning minority government for majority rule.

I am not sure MMP is more democratic – particularly in it’s current form.  I think it has been hijacked by extremists and is not representing the mainstream opinions of New Zealanders.

The system of MMP in NZ can obviously be improved and hopefully as circumstances change in the future needed improvements will occur.

On this point I completely agree with Winston.  MMP does not need to be done away with – it needs to be modified and sooner rather than later!

Hitler responds to the iPad

January 29th, 2010 4:00pm

Enjoy :-)

YouTube Preview Image

What The Greens and the iPad have in common

January 29th, 2010 9:19am

Steve Jobs with the new iPad

Yesterday’s announcement of the new iPad (an unfortunate choice of name – doesn’t Apple have any women in its marketing department?) and The Green’s new MP Gareth Hughes made me consider what really is the point of both?

I am a huge fan of Apple products  including my own iPhone which is so incredibly well designed it has literally changed my life. (Well at least the way I handle a lot of my day to day communications) 

Generally iPhone products are beautifully designed and supremely functional but in the case of the iPad – you have to wonder what “market need” was it designed to fill?  It is not as portable as  an iPhone, or as functional as a laptop and in terms of knocking Kindle of it’s pedestal, it would seem that  it’s screen in bright light conditions may  make reading somewhat difficult. (It certainly does on the iPhone)

Verdict:  A beautiful piece of technology but not something anyone actually needs.

And this is also true of The Greens. (Actually only the second part – but I have to say for her age Jeanette Fitzsimons was looking especially nice on the cover of one of our glossy magazines lately)

Everyone agrees that in 2010 the world needs to find more sustainable methods of production and sustainable ways to live.  Environmental concerns are now embedded in mainstream culture, and sadly The real Greens (if there ever were any – have missed the boat)  As Jeanette says her biggest disappointment was never having made Minister in all her years in Parliament. 

And to underscore the point yesterday we got to meet the new Green MP.

New Zealand's newest MP

Yes there he is, being arrested (Sue Bradford style)while dressed as Ronald McDonald over a protest of genetically modified chicken feed.  And this is my point.  Most people care about what they eat these days, we all care about the quality of the air we breathe and the cleanliness of our environment.  The Greens no longer have a monoply on these issues. 

They are not a Green Party they are a  party of protesters,  ready to hijack the latest populist cause for 5 minutes of recognition on the front page of the daily newspapers.  And like the iPad they were never conceived to fulfil anyone’s need except their own.

I think like the iPad  it is time for the The Greens to have a new name, one that truly reflects their particular brand.

All suggestions welcome!

Glaciergate

January 28th, 2010 4:41pm

Newsy.com does another excellent summary of the latest climate “science” controversy

Let down by Labour

January 28th, 2010 9:19am

Julie Walters

 

Normally political parties are happy to receive endorsements from celebrities, particularly when those celebrities are as respected and popular as British actress Julie Walters.

But this is one “endorsement” the British Labour Party could do without judging from this report

When asked about her views on politicians for an interview for a magazine  she said:

Politicians? They are slippery, evasive, irresponsible liars in the main. 

She says she now feels ‘disillusioned and let down’ by those she once actively encouraged. 
 
We’ve got a General Election coming up quite soon, and it’s got to the point where I don’t want to vote for any of them. I really don’t.”‘

It seems Julie is just one of a growing number of celebrities who are disassociating themselves from the Labour Party in Britain prior to the upcoming election.

Julie Walters has long been a staunch Labour supporter – appearing in one of the party’s campaign adverts and meeting her husband through their shared political views.  She plays the late Cabinet minister Mo Mowlam in a  drama to soon to be broadcast in Britain.